Skip to content

AT-2 Literacy Training and Awareness

Guidance: draftPolicy clause: draftWhat these mean

BaselinesImplementation levelEnhancements
Low, Moderate, High, PrivacyOrganization6 (2 in a baseline)

Related controls: AC-3, AC-17, AC-22, AT-3, AT-4, CP-3, IA-4, IR-2, IR-7, IR-9, PL-4, PM-13, PM-21, PS-7, PT-2, SA-8, SA-16

  • a. Provide security and privacy literacy training to system users (including managers, senior executives, and contractors):
    • 1. As part of initial training for new users and [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] thereafter; and
    • 2. When required by system changes or following [Assignment: organization-defined events];
  • b. Employ the following techniques to increase the security and privacy awareness of system users [Assignment: organization-defined awareness techniques];
  • c. Update literacy training and awareness content [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and following [Assignment: organization-defined events] ; and
  • d. Incorporate lessons learned from internal or external security incidents or breaches into literacy training and awareness techniques.
NIST discussion

Organizations provide basic and advanced levels of literacy training to system users, including measures to test the knowledge level of users. Organizations determine the content of literacy training and awareness based on specific organizational requirements, the systems to which personnel have authorized access, and work environments (e.g., telework). The content includes an understanding of the need for security and privacy as well as actions by users to maintain security and personal privacy and to respond to suspected incidents. The content addresses the need for operations security and the handling of personally identifiable information.

Awareness techniques include displaying posters, offering supplies inscribed with security and privacy reminders, displaying logon screen messages, generating email advisories or notices from organizational officials, and conducting awareness events. Literacy training after the initial training described in AT-2a.1 is conducted at a minimum frequency consistent with applicable laws, directives, regulations, and policies. Subsequent literacy training may be satisfied by one or more short ad hoc sessions and include topical information on recent attack schemes, changes to organizational security and privacy policies, revised security and privacy expectations, or a subset of topics from the initial training. Updating literacy training and awareness content on a regular basis helps to ensure that the content remains relevant. Events that may precipitate an update to literacy training and awareness content include, but are not limited to, assessment or audit findings, security incidents or breaches, or changes in applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines.

Baselines: Not in a baseline

Provide practical exercises in literacy training that simulate events and incidents.

Discussion and assessment objectives for AT-2(1)

Practical exercises include no-notice social engineering attempts to collect information, gain unauthorized access, or simulate the adverse impact of opening malicious email attachments or invoking, via spear phishing attacks, malicious web links.

Determine if practical exercises in literacy training that simulate events and incidents are provided.

Examine: System security plan; privacy plan; security awareness and training policy; procedures addressing security awareness training implementation; security awareness training curriculum; security awareness training materials; other relevant documents or records.

Interview: Organizational personnel who receive literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with responsibilities for security awareness training; organizational personnel with information security responsibilities.

Test: Mechanisms implementing cyber-attack simulations in practical exercises.

Baselines: Low, Moderate, High

Provide literacy training on recognizing and reporting potential indicators of insider threat.

Discussion and assessment objectives for AT-2(2)

Potential indicators and possible precursors of insider threat can include behaviors such as inordinate, long-term job dissatisfaction; attempts to gain access to information not required for job performance; unexplained access to financial resources; bullying or harassment of fellow employees; workplace violence; and other serious violations of policies, procedures, directives, regulations, rules, or practices. Literacy training includes how to communicate the concerns of employees and management regarding potential indicators of insider threat through channels established by the organization and in accordance with established policies and procedures. Organizations may consider tailoring insider threat awareness topics to the role. For example, training for managers may be focused on changes in the behavior of team members, while training for employees may be focused on more general observations.

Determine if:

  • AT-02(02)[01] literacy training on recognizing potential indicators of insider threat is provided;
  • AT-02(02)[02] literacy training on reporting potential indicators of insider threat is provided.

Examine: System security plan; privacy plan; literacy training and awareness policy; procedures addressing literacy training and awareness implementation; literacy training and awareness curriculum; literacy training and awareness materials; other relevant documents or records.

Interview: Organizational personnel who receive literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with responsibilities for literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with information security and privacy responsibilities.

Baselines: Moderate, High

Provide literacy training on recognizing and reporting potential and actual instances of social engineering and social mining.

Discussion and assessment objectives for AT-2(3)

Social engineering is an attempt to trick an individual into revealing information or taking an action that can be used to breach, compromise, or otherwise adversely impact a system. Social engineering includes phishing, pretexting, impersonation, baiting, quid pro quo, thread-jacking, social media exploitation, and tailgating. Social mining is an attempt to gather information about the organization that may be used to support future attacks. Literacy training includes information on how to communicate the concerns of employees and management regarding potential and actual instances of social engineering and data mining through organizational channels based on established policies and procedures.

Determine if:

  • AT-02(03)[01] literacy training on recognizing potential and actual instances of social engineering is provided;
  • AT-02(03)[02] literacy training on reporting potential and actual instances of social engineering is provided;
  • AT-02(03)[03] literacy training on recognizing potential and actual instances of social mining is provided;
  • AT-02(03)[04] literacy training on reporting potential and actual instances of social mining is provided.

Examine: System security plan; privacy plan; literacy training and awareness policy; procedures addressing literacy training and awareness implementation; literacy training and awareness curriculum; literacy training and awareness materials; other relevant documents or records.

Interview: Organizational personnel who receive literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with responsibilities for literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with information security and privacy responsibilities.

AT-2(4) Suspicious Communications and Anomalous System Behavior

Section titled “AT-2(4) Suspicious Communications and Anomalous System Behavior”

Baselines: Not in a baseline

Provide literacy training on recognizing suspicious communications and anomalous behavior in organizational systems using [Assignment: organization-defined indicators of malicious code].

Discussion and assessment objectives for AT-2(4)

A well-trained workforce provides another organizational control that can be employed as part of a defense-in-depth strategy to protect against malicious code coming into organizations via email or the web applications. Personnel are trained to look for indications of potentially suspicious email (e.g., receiving an unexpected email, receiving an email containing strange or poor grammar, or receiving an email from an unfamiliar sender that appears to be from a known sponsor or contractor). Personnel are also trained on how to respond to suspicious email or web communications. For this process to work effectively, personnel are trained and made aware of what constitutes suspicious communications. Training personnel on how to recognize anomalous behaviors in systems can provide organizations with early warning for the presence of malicious code. Recognition of anomalous behavior by organizational personnel can supplement malicious code detection and protection tools and systems employed by organizations.

Determine if literacy training on recognizing suspicious communications and anomalous behavior in organizational systems using [Assignment: organization-defined indicators of malicious code] is provided.

Examine: System security plan; privacy plan; literacy training and awareness policy; procedures addressing literacy training and awareness implementation; literacy training and awareness curriculum; literacy training and awareness materials; other relevant documents or records.

Interview: Organizational personnel who receive literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with responsibilities for basic literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with information security and privacy responsibilities.

Baselines: Not in a baseline

Provide literacy training on the advanced persistent threat.

Discussion and assessment objectives for AT-2(5)

An effective way to detect advanced persistent threats (APT) and to preclude successful attacks is to provide specific literacy training for individuals. Threat literacy training includes educating individuals on the various ways that APTs can infiltrate the organization (e.g., through websites, emails, advertisement pop-ups, articles, and social engineering). Effective training includes techniques for recognizing suspicious emails, use of removable systems in non-secure settings, and the potential targeting of individuals at home.

Determine if literacy training on the advanced persistent threat is provided.

Examine: System security plan; privacy plan; literacy training and awareness policy; procedures addressing literacy training and awareness implementation; literacy training and awareness curriculum; literacy training and awareness materials; other relevant documents or records.

Interview: Organizational personnel who receive literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with responsibilities for basic literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with information security and privacy responsibilities.

Baselines: Not in a baseline

  • (a) Provide literacy training on the cyber threat environment; and
  • (b) Reflect current cyber threat information in system operations.
Discussion and assessment objectives for AT-2(6)

Since threats continue to change over time, threat literacy training by the organization is dynamic. Moreover, threat literacy training is not performed in isolation from the system operations that support organizational mission and business functions.

Determine if:

  • AT-02(06)(a) literacy training on the cyber threat environment is provided;
  • AT-02(06)(b) system operations reflects current cyber threat information.

Examine: System security plan; privacy plan; literacy training and awareness policy; procedures addressing literacy training and awareness training implementation; literacy training and awareness curriculum; literacy training and awareness materials; other relevant documents or records.

Interview: Organizational personnel who receive literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with responsibilities for basic literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with information security and privacy responsibilities.

Objectives and methods for AT-2

Determine if:

  • AT-02a.
    • AT-02a.01
      • AT-02a.01[01] security literacy training is provided to system users (including managers, senior executives, and contractors) as part of initial training for new users;
      • AT-02a.01[02] privacy literacy training is provided to system users (including managers, senior executives, and contractors) as part of initial training for new users;
      • AT-02a.01[03] security literacy training is provided to system users (including managers, senior executives, and contractors) [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] thereafter;
      • AT-02a.01[04] privacy literacy training is provided to system users (including managers, senior executives, and contractors) [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] thereafter;
    • AT-02a.02
      • AT-02a.02[01] security literacy training is provided to system users (including managers, senior executives, and contractors) when required by system changes or following [Assignment: organization-defined events];
      • AT-02a.02[02] privacy literacy training is provided to system users (including managers, senior executives, and contractors) when required by system changes or following [Assignment: organization-defined events];
  • AT-02b. [Assignment: organization-defined awareness techniques] are employed to increase the security and privacy awareness of system users;
  • AT-02c.
    • AT-02c.[01] literacy training and awareness content is updated [Assignment: organization-defined frequency];
    • AT-02c.[02] literacy training and awareness content is updated following [Assignment: organization-defined events];
  • AT-02d. lessons learned from internal or external security incidents or breaches are incorporated into literacy training and awareness techniques.

Examine: System security plan; privacy plan; literacy training and awareness policy; procedures addressing literacy training and awareness implementation; appropriate codes of federal regulations; security and privacy literacy training curriculum; security and privacy literacy training materials; training records; other relevant documents or records.

Interview: Organizational personnel with responsibilities for literacy training and awareness; organizational personnel with information security and privacy responsibilities; organizational personnel comprising the general system user community.

Test: Mechanisms managing information security and privacy literacy training.

Policy statement

  • The Chief Information Security Officer shall provide security literacy training to all system users, including managers, senior executives and contractors, as part of initial training before they are given access, and Fill in: the frequency at which to provide security literacy training to system users (including managers, senior executives, and contractors) after initial training Typical: annually thereafter. (AT-2a.1)
  • The Senior privacy official shall provide privacy literacy training to all system users, including managers, senior executives and contractors, as part of initial training before they are given access, and Fill in: the frequency at which to provide privacy literacy training to system users (including managers, senior executives, and contractors) after initial training Typical: annually thereafter. (AT-2a.1)
  • The Chief Information Security Officer shall provide security literacy training when system changes require it, and following Fill in: events that require security literacy training for system users Typical: a significant system change, or an incident caused by user error. (AT-2a.2)
  • The Senior privacy official shall provide privacy literacy training when system changes require it, and following Fill in: events that require privacy literacy training for system users Typical: a significant change in how the organization processes personally identifiable information, or a privacy breach. (AT-2a.2)
  • The Chief Information Security Officer shall increase users’ security and privacy awareness through Fill in: techniques to be employed to increase the security and privacy awareness of system users Typical: phishing simulations, short awareness messages and posters. (AT-2b)
  • The Chief Information Security Officer shall update literacy training and awareness content Fill in: the frequency at which to update literacy training and awareness content Typical: annually and following Fill in: events that would require literacy training and awareness content to be updated Typical: a significant incident, or a significant change in threats. (AT-2c)
  • The Chief Information Security Officer shall incorporate lessons learned from internal and external security incidents and breaches into literacy training and awareness techniques. (AT-2d)

Federal systems

5 CFR 930.301 (OPM) requires that all users of federal information systems be exposed to security awareness materials at least annually, and that new employees receive awareness material before they are allowed access. 44 U.S.C. § 3554(b)(4) requires security awareness training for personnel, including contractors and other users. OMB Circular A-130 (July 28, 2016), Appendix II, section 5.g, requires mandatory agency-wide privacy awareness and training for all employees and contractors. Checked September 2026.

  • The Chief Information Security Officer shall give new employees security awareness material before they are allowed access to federal information systems. (AT-2a.1)
  • The Chief Information Security Officer shall expose every user of federal information systems, including contractors, to security awareness materials at least annually. (AT-2a.1)
  • The Senior privacy official shall maintain mandatory privacy awareness and training for all employees and contractors, as OMB Circular A-130 Appendix II requires. (AT-2a.1)

AT-2(2) Insider threat

  • The Chief Information Security Officer shall include in literacy training how to recognize and report potential indicators of insider threat. (AT-2(2))

AT-2(3) Social engineering and mining

  • The Chief Information Security Officer shall include in literacy training how to recognize and report potential and actual instances of social engineering and social mining. (AT-2(3))

From the Awareness and Training Policy template (draft). Highlighted fields are values your organization sets.

AT-2 covers the security and privacy training every user receives, plus the ongoing awareness activities between courses. Assessors look for three things: every user trained on joining and at the set interval, content kept current, and lessons from real incidents fed back in.

Common implementations. An annual online course assigned through the learning management system, required before first access and tracked to completion. Phishing simulations and short awareness messages through the year (AT-2b). Role-specific modules for insider threat recognition (AT-2(2)) and social engineering (AT-2(3)). Content reviewed each year and after significant incidents.

Organization-defined parameters. Typical values, which your organization may set differently:

ParameterTypical value
Refresher frequency (a.1)Annually
Events that trigger training (a.2)A significant system change, or an incident caused by user error
Awareness techniques (b)Phishing simulations, short awareness messages and posters
Content update frequency and triggers (c)Annually, and after a significant incident or change in threats

Evidence assessors ask for.

  • The training content and its last review date
  • Completion records for a sample of users, including new hires, compared against their first access dates
  • Records of awareness activities, such as phishing simulation results
  • An example of content changed because of an incident

Inheritance. Training is almost always an organization-wide common control; systems inherit it unless they need system-specific training.

Common findings.

  • Users granted access before completing initial training.
  • Contractors and senior executives missing from completion records.
  • Content unchanged for several years.

Enhancements in the Moderate baseline. AT-2(2) insider threat (also Low) and AT-2(3) social engineering and mining.

Artifacts

Independent guidance, not an official NIST publication. Control text is from NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 and SP 800-53A (public domain). Original content is licensed CC BY 4.0; program templates and the downloadable kit are dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0.