Skip to content

Change Request Form

Change Request Form template: The record of one configuration-controlled change, from request through security and privacy impact analysis, significant-change decision, testing, approval, implementation and verification, adapted from the sample change request and security impact analysis template in NIST SP 800-128, with a register of every change, as SP 800-53 CM-3 and CM-4 require.

TypeProgram stageStatusTemplate versionNIST basis
Form or registerCoreDraft1.0.0SP 800-53 release 5.2.0

The record of one configuration-controlled change, from request through security and privacy impact analysis, significant-change decision, testing, approval, implementation and verification, adapted from the sample change request and security impact analysis template in NIST SP 800-128, with a register of every change, as SP 800-53 CM-3 and CM-4 require.

ControlTitle
CM-3Configuration Change Control
CM-3(2)Testing, Validation, and Documentation of Changes
CM-4Impact Analyses
CM-4(1)Separate Test Environments
CM-4(2)Verification of Controls
VariantReady to adoptAnnotated
All baselinesWord · MarkdownWord · Markdown

The register as a spreadsheet: CSV, with one column per field.

SystemChange IDChange typeDate preparedStatus
Fill in: system name and identifierFill in: unique change IDFill in: standard, normal or emergencyFill in: dateFill in: requested, analyzed, approved, disapproved, on hold, implemented, verified or closed
  • Use this form for every type of change the system’s Configuration Management Plan lists as configuration-controlled (CM-3a). A standard change cites the change request that approved its class, and needs only Part A and Part F.
  • The analyst who completes Part B has security or privacy responsibilities and the skills to understand the change, and is not the person who will implement it. Part B is signed and dated before the decision in Part E (CM-4).
  • For an emergency change, the person the Configuration Management Plan names may approve the change so work can start. Part B is completed as soon as practical, and the change control board reviews the change at its next meeting, recording that review in Part E (CM-3).
  • Implement the change only after Part E records approval (CM-3d).
  • Keep the completed form, with its attachments, for Fill in: the time period to retain records of configuration-controlled changes Typical: at least one year, or the life of the system if longer (CM-3e).
  • Fill in: the configuration change control element responsible for coordinating and overseeing change control activities Typical: a change control board with the system owner, technical leads and a security representative reviews the register at each meeting for changes waiting on a decision, emergency changes not yet reviewed, and approved changes not yet verified (CM-3f, CM-3g).
FieldEntry
Title of the changeFill in: short title
Requested byFill in: name, role and team
Description of the changeFill in: what will change, including all additions, deletions and modifications
JustificationFill in: why the change is needed, for example a business requirement, a vulnerability, an audit finding
UrgencyFill in: scheduled, urgent or emergency
Configuration items and components to be changedFill in: configuration item IDs from the Configuration Management Plan and component IDs from the component inventory
Other components, configuration items or systems affectedFill in: dependencies, interfaces, and other systems and their owners
People involved in making the changeFill in: names or roles
Expected functional impactFill in: what users or operations will notice, and any outage
Impact of not making the changeFill in: the risk or cost of not changing
Interface or integration issuesFill in: known issues
Changes required to other applicationsFill in: changes, or none
Work planFill in: planned implementation date and window, deliverables, and the back-out plan
Resources or funding requiredFill in: resources, or none
Supporting documentsFill in: attachments, for example the design, vendor release notes

Part B. Security and privacy impact analysis

Section titled “Part B. Security and privacy impact analysis”
FieldEntry
Project typeFill in: new development, enhancement or maintenance
Systems affectedFill in: system names
Security categorization of the affected systemsFill in: for example Moderate
Baseline changesFill in: how the baseline configuration will change, for example a new image version or a new allowed port
Planned start and completion of deploymentFill in: dates

Mark each type that applies; more than one may apply.

Change typeApplies (X)Explanation
New network device, such as a router, switch, firewall or VPN gateway
New server, virtual machine, container image or cloud compute resource
New end-user device type, such as desktops, laptops or mobile devices
Other new hardware
Decommissioning of existing hardware or resources
New operating system, or upgrade of an existing one
New commercial or open-source software, or an upgrade or patch of it
New custom application, or an upgrade or fix of one
New database management system, database instance, or change to an existing one
New or upgraded middleware or service
New cloud service, or a change to a cloud service’s settings
Change to infrastructure-as-code definitions or the deployment pipeline
Change to ports, protocols or services used or provided by the system (CM-7)
Change to security functions, such as cryptographic modules, authentication, authorization, roles, logging or security patches
New information type processed, stored or transmitted, or new personal information
Interface or interconnection added, changed or removed (CA-3)
Change of location or hosting
Other change
Component ID (component inventory)Component nameNetwork addressManufacturer and modelSerial number or asset tagOperating system and versionSoftware affected
Fill in: IDFill in: nameFill in: addressFill in: manufacturer and modelFill in: serial or tagFill in: OS and versionFill in: software and versions
StepFindings
1. Understand the change: how it will be built and deployed, with a high-level architecture overview where useful. For a change already made, what the audit records and the people who made it showFill in: summary
2. Identify vulnerabilities: known vulnerabilities in products being added, for example from the National Vulnerability Database or the vendor’s advisories; for custom code, the results of code review or testingFill in: vulnerabilities found, or none, with the sources checked
3. Assess risks: the likelihood and impact of each vulnerability being exploited, and whether to accept, avoid or reduce the riskFill in: risk rating and response
4. Assess the impact on existing controls: controls the change alters, settings or baselines it changes, and other components or systems that depend on what is changing, including supply chain partnersFill in: controls affected, by control ID, and how
5. Plan safeguards and countermeasures: changes to the request, or controls to add, where the risk is not acceptableFill in: safeguards, or none needed
QuestionAnswer
Does the change add, remove or alter personal information the system processes, or how it is processed or shared?Fill in: yes or no, and how
Does the privacy impact assessment or a system of records notice need updating?Fill in: yes or no; reference to the update
Privacy reviewerFill in: name, role and date, or not applicable
AnalystRoleDate completed
Fill in: nameFill in: role with security or privacy responsibilitiesFill in: date, which is before the decision date in Part E
QuestionAnswer
Is this a significant change under section 12 of the system’s Continuous Monitoring Strategy?Fill in: yes or no
ReasonFill in: the criterion it meets, or why it meets none
Decided byFill in: name, role and date
If yes: date the authorizing official was told, and howFill in: date and method
If yes: the authorizing official’s decisionFill in: for example proceed with a targeted assessment of the affected controls, reauthorize, or proceed and accept the risk; name and date
If yes: system security plan, privacy plan and continuous monitoring strategy updates neededFill in: documents and sections
FieldEntry
Test environmentFill in: environment, and how it is separated from production
Tests performedFill in: the tests run against the change, functional and security, such as a compliance scan and a vulnerability scan of the changed component
ResultsFill in: results for each test, or a reference to the test record
Tested and validated by, and dateFill in: name and date

The change is tested, validated and documented before its implementation is finalized (CM-3(2)).

FieldEntry
DecisionFill in: approved, approved with conditions, disapproved, or on hold
Conditions or further actionFill in: conditions, such as added safeguards; or, if disapproved, the reason and what would change the decision
Decided byFill in: the change control board, with the meeting date, or the emergency approver
Security representative presentFill in: name
Emergency change reviewed by the board onFill in: date, or not applicable
ApproverRoleSignatureDate
Fill in: nameFill in: roleFill in: date

Part F. Implementation, verification and closure

Section titled “Part F. Implementation, verification and closure”
FieldEntry
Implemented by, date and timeFill in: name, date and time
Implementation resultFill in: successful, partially successful, or backed out, with details
Controls verified after the change, by whom and howFill in: for example compliance and vulnerability scans compared with the results before the change, and a test of the affected controls
Verification resultFill in: the affected controls are implemented correctly, operating as intended and producing the desired outcome, or what was found
Documents updatedFill in: baseline configuration, component inventory, system security plan, configuration item list, diagrams, plan of action and milestones, or none
Stakeholders notifiedFill in: who was told, for example users and the service desk
Closed by and dateFill in: name and date

OMB Circular A-130, Appendix I, section 5.i, defines a significant change as “a change that is likely to affect the security or privacy state of an information system,” and says that under ongoing authorization, reauthorization is typically an event-driven action in response to an event or significant change that raises security or privacy risk above the agency’s risk tolerance, and may be a complete or a targeted review. Section 5.a says systems undergoing significant changes are expected to meet NIST standards and guidelines immediately on deployment. As of October 2026.

  • The Part C decision shall use the OMB Circular A-130 definition of a significant change, and each significant change shall be reported to the authorizing official before it is implemented, or, for an emergency change, as soon as it is made. (CM-4)
  • A significant change shall be deployed meeting the current versions of the NIST standards and guidelines that apply to it, as OMB Circular A-130, Appendix I, section 5.a, expects. (CM-3)
Change IDTitleRequested by and dateTypeConfiguration items affectedImpact analysis by and dateSecurity and privacy impactSignificant change; authorizing official toldTest resultDecision, by and dateImplemented by and dateVerification resultClosed
Fill in: IDFill in: titleFill in: name and dateFill in: standard, normal or emergencyFill in: CI IDsFill in: analyst and dateFill in: summary and risk ratingFill in: no; or yes, with the date toldFill in: pass or fail, with referenceFill in: decision, board or approver, dateFill in: name and dateFill in: resultFill in: date

Independent guidance, not an official NIST publication. Control text is from NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 and SP 800-53A (public domain). Original content is licensed CC BY 4.0; program templates and the downloadable kit are dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0.