Skip to content

Information Exchange Agreement

Information Exchange Agreement template: The agreement that approves and governs one exchange of information with a system outside the authorization boundary, usable as an interconnection security agreement or an information exchange security agreement, with a register of every exchange and its review date, as SP 800-53 CA-3 requires.

TypeProgram stageStatusTemplate versionNIST basis
Form or registerOperateDraft1.0.0SP 800-53 release 5.2.0

The agreement that approves and governs one exchange of information with a system outside the authorization boundary, usable as an interconnection security agreement or an information exchange security agreement, with a register of every exchange and its review date, as SP 800-53 CA-3 requires.

ControlTitle
CA-3Information Exchange
CA-3(6)Transfer Authorizations
SA-9External System Services
VariantReady to adoptAnnotated
All baselinesWord · MarkdownWord · Markdown

The register as a spreadsheet: CSV, with one column per field.

Agreement IDAgreement typeVersionEffective dateNext review due
Fill in: unique ID, as in the registerFill in: interconnection security agreement or information exchange agreementFill in: versionFill in: dateFill in: date

This agreement sets the terms, conditions and safeguards under which Organization name and Fill in: the other organization exchange the information described in section 2. It is one of the agreements Organization name uses to approve and manage information exchanges, which are Select one or more: interconnection security agreements; information exchange security agreements; memoranda of understanding or agreement; service level agreements; user agreements; non-disclosure agreements; [Assignment: organization-defined type of agreement] Typical: interconnection security agreements or information exchange security agreements, and service level agreements or contract terms with the same content for external services (CA-3a).

ItemDescription
Business purposeFill in: why the exchange is needed and the benefit expected
AuthorityFill in: the law, contract, policy or decision that authorizes the exchange
Related agreementsFill in: for example a memorandum of understanding, contract, service level agreement or nondisclosure agreement, with dates
SupersedesFill in: the earlier agreement this replaces, with its date, or “none”
ItemOrganization name systemOther party’s system
System name and identifierFill in: name and identifierFill in: name and identifier
Owning organizationOrganization nameFill in: organization
Authorizing officialFill in: name and titleFill in: name and title
Security categorizationFill in: low, moderate or highFill in: low, moderate or high
LocationFill in: site or cloud regionFill in: site or cloud region

The interface and the information communicated (CA-3b):

ItemDescription
Information types and impact levelFill in: each type of information exchanged, with its impact level, and whether it includes personally identifiable information
DirectionFill in: one-way from which system, or two-way
MethodFill in: system interconnection, application programming interface or web service, database access, file transfer, email, or portable media
Frequency and volumeFill in: for example a nightly batch with its typical size, or continuous
UsersFill in: who on each side can access the exchanged information, and any screening required
  • The receiving party uses the information only for the purpose in section 1, and only as that purpose requires.
  • The receiving party does not disclose the information to anyone not party to this agreement without the providing party’s written consent, unless a law requires it. Fill in: any further limits, for example no transfer outside the country
  • Access is limited to the receiving party’s employees, contractors and agents who need the information for the stated purpose, and who have signed an access agreement or equivalent user agreement.
  • The receiving party keeps the information for Fill in: retention period or rule, then returns or destroys it as the providing party directs, and confirms the destruction in writing.

Each party protects the exchanged information, and the systems that process, store or transmit it, according to its impact level (CA-3b).

RequirementCommitment
Governing policies and baselineFill in: each party’s governing security and privacy policies, and the control baseline each system meets, for example the SP 800-53B Moderate baseline
Protection in transitFill in: for example encryption with validated cryptographic modules over the whole path
Protection at restFill in: for example encrypted storage on the receiving system
Authentication and accessFill in: for example multifactor authentication for users, and certificates or keys for system accounts
Accounts authorized to transfer dataFill in: for a High system, the accounts or systems allowed to send data and the write permissions each holds (CA-3(6)); otherwise “not required”
Event loggingFill in: the events each party logs for the exchange, for example transfers, access attempts and administrator actions, and how long logs are kept
Personally identifiable informationFill in: privacy requirements, for example minimization, use limits and breach notification, or “none exchanged”

Complete this section only for a system interconnection.

ItemDescription
Services offeredFill in: the services the interconnection provides, or that it carries data only
InterfaceFill in: endpoints, protocols and ports
Boundary protectionFill in: the firewalls, gateways or other managed interfaces at each end (SC-7)
TopologyFill in: reference to the attached diagram of the interconnection
AvailabilityFill in: the availability expected of the connection, and any service level agreement

Each party, for its own system:

  • keeps the controls in section 4 in place, and keeps its system authorized to operate;
  • manages the accounts used for the exchange, and removes access when it is no longer needed;
  • reviews the event logs for the exchange Fill in: how often, and shares relevant findings with the other party;
  • includes the exchange in its security assessments and continuous monitoring, and provides a summary of relevant results to the other party on request;
  • records the exchange and this agreement in its system security plan (CA-3a);
  • coordinates its contingency plan with the other party where the exchange supports an essential function.
EventWho notifies whomHow quickly
A suspected or confirmed security incident or breach affecting the exchange or the exchanged informationThe party that detects it, to the other party’s incident contact in section 8Fill in: time from detection, and when written notice follows
A disaster or outage that disrupts the exchangeThe affected party, to the other party’s technical contactFill in: time
A planned change to either system that affects the exchangeThe initiating party, to the other partyBefore the change, so the agreement can be reviewed and updated first
A new connection between either system and another systemThe initiating party, to the other partyFill in: notice period
A change of system owner, authorizing official or contactThe changing party, to the other partyFill in: time
RoleOrganization nameOther party
System ownerFill in: name, phone, emailFill in: name, phone, email
Technical leadFill in: name, phone, emailFill in: name, phone, email
Security contactFill in: name, phone, emailFill in: name, phone, email
Incident contactFill in: team, phone, emailFill in: team, phone, email
Privacy contactFill in: name, phone, emailFill in: name, phone, email
  • This agreement takes effect on the date of the last signature and remains in effect until Fill in: the end date, or until terminated.
  • The System owner reviews and updates this agreement, with the other party, Fill in: the frequency at which to review and update agreements Typical: at least annually, and when either system makes a significant change that affects the exchange (CA-3c). Each party certifies at the review that it has complied with the agreement and reports any changes to the exchange.
  • Changes to this agreement are made in writing and signed by both parties.
  • Either party may end the exchange with Fill in: notice period written notice. Either party may suspend it immediately if a security incident requires, or if the other party misuses the information or breaks this agreement.
  • When the exchange ends, the parties disconnect it, disable the accounts used, return or destroy the exchanged information as section 3 requires, and update their system security plans (CA-3a).

The authorizing official for each system approves this exchange (CA-3a). Each signatory confirms that they have authority to commit their organization to this agreement.

NameTitleOrganizationSignatureDate
Fill in: nameAuthorizing officialOrganization nameFill in: date
Fill in: nameAuthorizing official or equivalentFill in: other organizationFill in: date

OMB Circular A-130, Appendix I, section 4.c(16), requires the authorizing official’s approval for connections from a system, as defined by its authorization boundary, to other systems, based on the risk to agency operations and assets, individuals, other organizations and the Nation. Section 4.j(2)(f) requires agreements, such as memoranda of understanding, interconnection security agreements or contracts, for interfaces between agency systems and systems that contractors or other entities use or operate on the Government’s behalf. Section 4.i(14) requires agencies to encrypt all FIPS 199 moderate-impact and high-impact information at rest and in transit, unless it is technically infeasible or would demonstrably affect the mission, and the authorizing official accepts the risk of not encrypting with the approval of the agency Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the Senior Agency Official for Privacy as appropriate; section 4.i(15) requires validated cryptographic modules under NIST standards. Where the exchange discloses records from a system of records for a computer matching program, the Privacy Act requires a separate written matching agreement (5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)). As of September 2026.

  • The authorizing official shall base the approval in section 10 on the risk to agency operations and assets, individuals, other organizations and the Nation, as OMB Circular A-130, Appendix I, section 4.c(16), requires. (CA-3a)
  • The System owner shall ensure moderate-impact and high-impact information exchanged under this agreement is encrypted in transit and at rest with validated cryptographic modules, or that the authorizing official has accepted the risk of not encrypting it with the Chief Information Officer’s approval, as OMB Circular A-130, Appendix I, section 4.i(14) and (15), requires. (CA-3b)
  • The System owner shall confirm with the Senior privacy official whether the exchange is a computer matching program, and if so ensure a matching agreement under 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o) is in place before records are disclosed. (CA-3b)
Agreement IDOrganization’s systemOther organization and systemAgreement typeMethodInformation and impact levelApproved byEffective dateLast reviewNext review dueStatusWhere the signed copy is kept
Fill in: IDFill in: systemFill in: organization and systemFill in: typeFill in: methodFill in: information and impact levelFill in: authorizing officialFill in: dateFill in: dateFill in: dateFill in: active, suspended or endedFill in: location

Independent guidance, not an official NIST publication. Control text is from NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 and SP 800-53A (public domain). Original content is licensed CC BY 4.0; program templates and the downloadable kit are dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0.