System and Services Acquisition Decision Worksheet
System and Services Acquisition Decision Worksheet template: Every decision the System and Services Acquisition family of NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 forces, with typical values and who decides, per baseline, as a spreadsheet.
| Type | Program stage | Status | Template version | NIST basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision worksheet | Operate | Draft | 1.0.0 | SP 800-53 release 5.2.0 |
What it is
Section titled “What it is”Every decision the System and Services Acquisition family asks your organization to make before its policy and procedures can be final: the family’s key questions, then each organization-defined parameter of every SA control in the baseline, with a typical value where the System and Services Acquisition Policy gives one. Download the spreadsheet, fill the “Your value” column with the people who decide, and carry the values into the policy’s highlighted fields.
Typical values are starting points, not recommendations for every system. “Who decides” defaults to the role accountable for the family policy; many organizations delegate system-level values to the system owner.
Downloads
Section titled “Downloads”| Variant | Spreadsheet |
|---|---|
| Low | CSV |
| Moderate | CSV |
| High | CSV |
| Privacy | CSV |
Decisions (Moderate baseline)
Section titled “Decisions (Moderate baseline)”40 decisions.
| Decision | Control | Typical value | Who decides |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which system development life cycle do systems follow, and where in it are the security and privacy activities and approvals? | SA-3, SA-8, SA-15 | One organization-wide life cycle with five phases (initiation, development or acquisition, implementation and assessment, operations and maintenance, and disposal), each with named security and privacy activities and a gate the system owner cannot pass without the security and privacy reviews. | Chief Information Officer, with the Chief Information Security Officer and the senior privacy official |
| Who maintains the standard security and privacy contract language, and who checks that each acquisition uses it? | SA-4, SA-4(1), SA-4(2), SA-4(9), SA-4(10) | The procurement office keeps standard clauses that the Chief Information Security Officer and the senior privacy official approve; the system owner adds system-specific requirements, and the security team reviews each solicitation for a system, component or service before it is issued. | Chief Information Security Officer, with the procurement office |
| Who reviews an external service before the organization uses it, and how is the provider’s compliance checked afterwards? | SA-9, SA-9(2) | The security team reviews each new external service and its shared responsibility matrix before contract award; the system owner reviews the provider’s independent attestation reports each year and the provider’s status reports as they arrive. | Chief Information Security Officer |
| What must developers of custom systems and components deliver as evidence, and who reviews it? | SA-10, SA-11, SA-15, SA-15(3) | Configuration management records, the developer’s test plan and results (including static analysis, component analysis and dynamic testing), the flaw tracking record and the development tool list, reviewed by the system owner and the security team before each release is accepted. | System owner, with the Chief Information Security Officer |
| What happens to a component when its vendor stops supporting it, and who can approve keeping it? | SA-22 | The component is replaced before its end-of-support date; where that is not possible, the authorizing official may approve continued use for a set period, with extended support from an external provider, isolation and extra monitoring, recorded in the plan of action and milestones. | Authorizing official |
| Personnel or roles to whom the system and services acquisition policy is to be disseminated | SA-1 | Everyone within its scope, through the policy library | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Personnel or roles to whom the system and services acquisition procedures are to be disseminated | SA-1 | The people who carry them out, and the system owners | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Select one or more: organization-level; mission/business process-level; system-level | SA-1 | Organization-level | Chief Information Security Officer |
| An official to manage the system and services acquisition policy and procedures | SA-1 | Chief Information Security Officer | Chief Information Security Officer |
| The frequency at which the current system and services acquisition policy is reviewed and updated | SA-1 | Annually | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Events that would require the current system and services acquisition policy to be reviewed and updated | SA-1 | Assessment or audit findings, security incidents or breaches, and changes in applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards or guidelines | Chief Information Security Officer |
| The frequency at which the current system and services acquisition procedures are reviewed and updated | SA-1 | Annually | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Events that would require the system and services acquisition procedures to be reviewed and updated | SA-1 | The same events as the policy, and changes to the systems, tools or services the procedures describe | Chief Information Security Officer |
| System development life cycle | SA-3 | The organization’s documented system development life cycle, with security and privacy activities and a review gate in each phase: initiation, development or acquisition, implementation and assessment, operations and maintenance, and disposal | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Select one or more: standardized contract language; organization-defined contract language (see its row below) | SA-4 | Standardized contract language that the procurement office maintains and the Chief Information Security Officer and senior privacy official approve, with system-specific requirements added for each acquisition | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Contract language | SA-4 | See the selection above | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Select one or more: security-relevant external system interfaces; high-level design; low-level design; source code or hardware schematics; organization-defined design and implementation information (see its row below) | SA-4(2) | Security-relevant external system interfaces and high-level design, and for High systems also low-level design | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Design and implementation information | SA-4(2) | See the selection above | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Level of detail | SA-4(2) | Enough detail to show, for each subsystem and interface, which controls it implements and how | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Actions to take when system, system component, or system service documentation is either unavailable or nonexistent | SA-5 | Ask the manufacturer or supplier again and search its published material; where the documentation is essential to operating a control, write it in-house; and record any remaining gap as a risk in the risk register | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Personnel or roles to distribute system documentation to | SA-5 | The system owner, the system security officer and the system administrators | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Systems security engineering principles | SA-8 | The principles for trustworthy secure design in NIST SP 800-160 Vol. 1 Rev. 1, Appendix E, as the system’s security architecture selects them, including least privilege, least functionality, defense in depth, protective defaults and protective failure | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Privacy engineering principles | SA-8 | The privacy engineering objectives of predictability, manageability and disassociability from NIST IR 8062, and minimization (SA-8(33)) | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Controls to be employed by external system service providers | SA-9 | The controls of the system’s baseline that the provider is responsible for, per the shared responsibility matrix, with evidence from an independent attestation | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Processes, methods, and techniques employed to monitor control compliance by external service providers | SA-9 | Annual review of independent attestation reports, review of the provider’s continuous monitoring or status reports, and contract service reviews | Chief Information Security Officer |
| External system services that require the identification of functions, ports, protocols, and other services | SA-9(2) | All external system services that connect to the system | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Select one or more: design; development; implementation; operation; disposal | SA-10 | Design, development, implementation and operation | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Configuration items under configuration management | SA-10 | Design specifications, source code, build scripts and pipeline configuration, infrastructure and configuration as code, test scripts and results, and each released executable | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Personnel to whom security flaws and flaw resolutions within the system, component, or service are reported | SA-10 | The system owner and the Chief Information Security Officer | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Select one or more: unit; integration; system; regression | SA-11 | Unit, integration, system and regression | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Frequency at which to conduct the selected unit, integration, system or regression testing/evaluation | SA-11 | With each build for automated tests, and before each release to production for system and regression testing | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Depth and coverage of the selected unit, integration, system or regression testing/evaluation | SA-11 | Static analysis of all custom code, analysis of third-party and open-source components for known vulnerabilities, dynamic testing of every externally reachable interface, and a test for each security and privacy requirement | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Frequency at which to review the development process, standards, tools, tool options, and tool configurations | SA-15 | At least annually, and before a new development tool or a major change to the development process is adopted | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Security requirements to be satisfied by the process, standards, tools, tool options, and tool configurations | SA-15 | The security requirements in the acquisition contract (SA-4) and the organization’s secure software development practices | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Privacy requirements to be satisfied by the process, standards, tools, tool options, and tool configurations | SA-15 | The privacy requirements recorded in the system’s privacy impact assessment | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Decision points in the system development life cycle | SA-15(3) | During design, before acquiring major components or services, and when the architecture changes significantly | Chief Information Security Officer |
| The breadth of criticality analysis | SA-15(3) | The components and functions that support the system’s critical functions, including third-party and open-source components | Chief Information Security Officer |
| The depth of criticality analysis | SA-15(3) | Down to the component and software module level for each critical function, naming the supplier of each critical component | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Select one or more: in-house support; organization-defined support from external providers (see its row below) | SA-22 | Support from an external provider under contract, such as extended vendor support or a third-party support provider; in-house support only for an isolated component whose replacement is scheduled | Chief Information Security Officer |
| Support from external providers | SA-22 | See the selection above | Chief Information Security Officer |
Independent guidance, not an official NIST publication. Control text is from NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 and SP 800-53A (public domain). Original content is licensed CC BY 4.0; program templates and the downloadable kit are dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0.